Skip to content

Guides

Mifflin-St Jeor Equation

The Mifflin-St Jeor equation is widely regarded as a reliable method for calculating basal metabolic rate and daily calorie needs.

⚕️

Medical Review: This article was written and reviewed in accordance with clinical nutrition guidelines (2026). Evidence-based content.

The Mifflin-St Jeor equation (1990) revolutionized calorie calculation. Unlike the older Harris-Benedict formula, it uses modern metabolic data and shows 85–90% accuracy for most people. It remains the gold standard for predicting basal metabolic rate in healthy adults.

Historical context

Before 1990, the Harris-Benedict equation (1919) was the dominant formula for estimating BMR. But Harris-Benedict was developed using a small, homogeneous sample of mostly young men, and it systematically overestimates metabolic rate in modern populations. Dr. Michael Mifflin and Dr. Steven St Jeor recognized this limitation and designed a new study with 247 healthy adults of varying ages, weights, and body compositions. Their result — the Mifflin-St Jeor equation — cut the prediction error significantly and became the most widely adopted BMR formula in nutrition science, clinical dietetics, and fitness.

Mifflin-St Jeor equation formulas

Illustration of the Mifflin-St Jeor equation for calculating BMR.
MetricFormula
Weight unitsKilograms (kg)
Height unitsCentimeters (cm)
Age unitsYears

For men:

BMR = 10 × weight(kg) + 6.25 × height(cm) - 5 × age + 5

For women:

BMR = 10 × weight(kg) + 6.25 × height(cm) - 5 × age - 161

The only difference between the men's and women's formulas is the constant at the end: +5 for men, −161 for women. This reflects average differences in lean body mass and body composition between sexes.

How Mifflin-St Jeor compares to Harris-Benedict

Developed in 1990 using modern metabolic data, Mifflin-St Jeor outperforms the 1919 Harris-Benedict equation. See our BMR equations comparison for details.

Mifflin-St Jeor example calculation

For a 35-year-old woman, 165 cm, 70 kg:

BMR = 10 × 70 + 6.25 × 165 - 5 × 35 - 161
BMR = 700 + 1,031.25 - 175 - 161 = 1,495 calories/day

With moderate activity (1.55): 1,495 × 1.55 = 2,317 maintenance calories.

Mifflin-St Jeor for different populations

The equation was validated on healthy, non-obese adults. It performs well for:

  • General adult population: 85–90% accuracy for most people
  • Overweight and obese individuals: slightly less accurate than for lean individuals, but still better than Harris-Benedict
  • Older adults: reasonably accurate, though BMR naturally declines with age and muscle loss

It may be less accurate for:

  • Very lean athletes: body fat percentage is low, and muscle mass is high
  • Clinical populations: thyroid disorders, metabolic syndrome, or severe obesity
  • Children and adolescents: still growing, with different energy needs

Accuracy discussion

Mifflin-St Jeor typically predicts BMR within ±10–15% of measured values in a lab. That is good enough for everyday use, but it is not perfect. Individual variation exists due to genetics, hormone levels, body composition, and adaptation. The best way to confirm your true maintenance is to track your weight and adjust intake based on real-world results for 2–3 weeks.

How to use Mifflin-St Jeor for TDEE

Once you have your BMR from Mifflin-St Jeor, multiply it by an activity factor to get TDEE:

Activity levelMultiplier
Sedentary1.2
Lightly active1.375
Moderately active1.55
Very active1.725
Extra active1.9

The TDEE calculator automates this entire process. For a standalone resting number, use the BMR.

Step-by-step calculation example

Let's calculate BMR and TDEE for a 28-year-old man, 178 cm, 82 kg, moderately active:

Step 1: BMR = 10 × 82 + 6.25 × 178 - 5 × 28 + 5
BMR = 820 + 1,112.5 - 140 + 5 = 1,797.5

Step 2: TDEE = 1,797.5 × 1.55 = 2,786 calories/day

He would eat 2,286–2,536 calories/day for weight loss, or 3,036–3,286 calories/day for muscle gain.

Why Mifflin-St Jeor is the standard

Research validates its accuracy:

  • 85–90% accurate vs measured metabolic rate
  • Lower standard error than Harris-Benedict
  • Works across diverse populations
  • Used by Calorie Calculator and all our guides

Ready to calculate your needs?

Use our free, science-backed calculator to find your exact calorie and macro targets.

Open Calorie Calculator

Medical & Scientific References

Frequently asked questions

What is the Mifflin-St Jeor equation?

Mifflin-St Jeor (1990) is the widely used equation for estimating BMR: Men=10×weight+6.25×height-5×age+5; Women=same minus 161. Used in our <a href='/'>calorie calculator</a>.

How accurate is Mifflin-St Jeor?

Research shows 85–90% accuracy versus measured metabolic rate, better than Harris-Benedict. Individual variation of 10–15% is normal.

What does BMR measure?

BMR measures calories burned at complete rest for basic bodily functions: breathing, circulation, cell repair, brain function.

How to measure BMR accurately?

Best methods: indirect calorimetry in lab, BMR calculator using Mifflin-St Jeor for everyday use, or track weight changes to calibrate.

Who developed the Mifflin-St Jeor equation?

Dr. Mifflin and Dr. St Jeor published the equation in 1990 based on a study of 247 healthy adults. It replaced the older Harris-Benedict equation with a more accurate model for modern populations.

Can Mifflin-St Jeor be used for TDEE?

Yes. Mifflin-St Jeor gives you BMR, which you then multiply by an activity factor (1.2 to 1.9) to get TDEE. Our <a href='/tdee-calculator/'>TDEE calculator</a> automates this.

Does Mifflin-St Jeor work for athletes?

It works well for most people, but very lean or very muscular athletes may need adjustments. Katch-McArdle or Cunningham equations, which use body fat percentage, can be more accurate for this population.

Calculate your numbers

Put this into practice - get your personalized calorie and macro targets free.

Advanced Practitioner Notes on Metabolic Health

While the mathematical formulas and generalized guidelines provided above serve as an excellent starting point, true metabolic health is highly individualized. The equations we use—such as the Mifflin-St Jeor or Harris-Benedict—were developed by studying population averages. They represent a baseline estimate of your body's energy expenditure. However, your actual daily energy needs can fluctuate based on numerous highly specific physiological factors.

For example, your Non-Exercise Activity Thermogenesis (NEAT)—the energy you burn through subconscious movements like fidgeting, maintaining posture, or casual walking—can vary by hundreds of calories from day to day. A person who works a highly active job will naturally have a significantly higher metabolic baseline than someone who is sedentary, even if their age, weight, and height are identical.

Furthermore, metabolic adaptation is a real phenomenon. When you remain in a caloric deficit for an extended period, your body intuitively attempts to conserve energy. This evolutionary survival mechanism means that as you lose weight, your Basal Metabolic Rate (BMR) slightly decreases, and you may unconsciously reduce your NEAT. This is why a caloric intake that caused weight loss initially may eventually become your new maintenance level, requiring a strategic diet break or further caloric adjustment.

Similarly, when in a caloric surplus (bulking), some individuals experience an upregulation in NEAT. Their bodies spontaneously burn off a portion of the excess calories through increased heat production and subconscious movement. This explains why some people struggle to gain weight even when they believe they are eating a significant surplus.

The Role of Nutrient Density

Finally, we must emphasize that while energy balance (calories in versus calories out) dictates changes in mass, macronutrient distribution dictates changes in body composition, and micronutrient density dictates overall physiological function. Consuming 2,000 calories of ultra-processed foods will yield vastly different long-term health outcomes, hormonal profiles, and energy levels than consuming 2,000 calories of whole, nutrient-dense foods. We strongly advocate utilizing these mathematical guidelines as tools within a broader framework of holistic, sustainable nutrition.

Advanced Practitioner Notes on Metabolic Health

While the mathematical formulas and generalized guidelines provided above serve as an excellent starting point, true metabolic health is highly individualized. The equations we use—such as the Mifflin-St Jeor or Harris-Benedict—were developed by studying population averages. They represent a baseline estimate of your body's energy expenditure. However, your actual daily energy needs can fluctuate based on numerous highly specific physiological factors.

For example, your Non-Exercise Activity Thermogenesis (NEAT)—the energy you burn through subconscious movements like fidgeting, maintaining posture, or casual walking—can vary by hundreds of calories from day to day. A person who works a highly active job will naturally have a significantly higher metabolic baseline than someone who is sedentary, even if their age, weight, and height are identical.

Furthermore, metabolic adaptation is a real phenomenon. When you remain in a caloric deficit for an extended period, your body intuitively attempts to conserve energy. This evolutionary survival mechanism means that as you lose weight, your Basal Metabolic Rate (BMR) slightly decreases, and you may unconsciously reduce your NEAT. This is why a caloric intake that caused weight loss initially may eventually become your new maintenance level, requiring a strategic diet break or further caloric adjustment.

Similarly, when in a caloric surplus (bulking), some individuals experience an upregulation in NEAT. Their bodies spontaneously burn off a portion of the excess calories through increased heat production and subconscious movement. This explains why some people struggle to gain weight even when they believe they are eating a significant surplus.

The Role of Nutrient Density

Finally, we must emphasize that while energy balance (calories in versus calories out) dictates changes in mass, macronutrient distribution dictates changes in body composition, and micronutrient density dictates overall physiological function. Consuming 2,000 calories of ultra-processed foods will yield vastly different long-term health outcomes, hormonal profiles, and energy levels than consuming 2,000 calories of whole, nutrient-dense foods. We strongly advocate utilizing these mathematical guidelines as tools within a broader framework of holistic, sustainable nutrition.